For a lot of years us photographers have only been looking forward when it comes to cameras, always buying the new gear and getting rid of the old. But recently there have been a trend to look back, did the old sensor have something the new sensors don’t have? Especially the X-Trans 1 and X-Trans 2 sensor cameras have become very popular to re-buy. I also did the same and here are my analyses of the Fujifilm X-Trans sensors.

X-Trans 1

The first sensor that got Fujifilm X-mount camera started, a 16 megapixel sensor, an ok start but not perfect. Sensor was found in Fujifilm X-E1, X-M1, X-Pro1.


  • I like the golden colors it produces, good for autumn photos. Something X-Trans 3 or newer has lost.
  • Has a bit of that filmic look, highlights and shadows just look different than newer sensors.


  • Dynamic range and iso noise is worse than newer sensor.
  • The sensor was contrast focus only, meaning super slow auto focus.
  • The colors can be good but they are almost too “vintage” for my taste.
  • Images looks a bit unsharp.
Shot with Fujifilm X-E1: a good example of X-Trans 1’s strengths and weaknesses, nice golden colors but terrible iso performance when raising shadows and bad dynamic range (even though I shot it very underexposed).
Shot with Fujifilm X-M1: not very special photo, but it shows the film like quality of X-Trans 1 sensor, colors are very nice but image quality is also a little bit soft/unsharp.
View from Mellie─ža, Malta – A good example of how to get very film like photos with X-Trans 1, I raised the shadows and lowered saturation. Shot with Fujifilm X-M1 + XF 35mm f2 R WR

X-Trans 2

This is a great sensors, 16 megapixel, a sensor that got a lot of people hooked on Fujifilm. Sensor was found in Fujifilm X-T1, X-T10, X-E2, X100S, X100T, X70 etc.


  • Colors are absolutely great on this camera, probably my favorite. Yellow colors gives this golden look. Also blue colors.
  • Dynamic range is actually pretty good for this old camera, close to to the newer cameras. Iso noise is also good, just use lower iso’s. Of cause for high iso’s this sensor is not as good as newer sensor, but that’s expected.


  • Auto focus is a lot better than X-Trans 1 because of the phase detection auto focus, but still not something you can use for fast moving subjects. You can use it to shoot photos of your friends and family but not for sports.
  • For low light night photography this sensor is not the best. Not only the iso performance but also something with the colors. Prefer newer sensors for night photography.
Shot with Fujifilm X-100T: there is just nothing like the golden colors from X-Trans 2.
Shot with Fujifilm X-T10: I just cannot recreate those golden colors with other sensor, and I don’t care that idiots like Tony Northrup says that color science is a lie.

X-Trans 3

This sensor was the one that made Fujifilm useable for professional photographers, fast auto focus and good iso noise performance. Sensor was found in Fujifilm X-T2, X-T20, X-E3, X-Pro2, X100F, etc.


  • Good iso performance, some tests even show that the X-Trans 3 is better than X-Trans 4.
  • Good auto focus, usable for fast moving subjects. The sensor also had phase detection, but the processor was faster and auto focus worked better.
  • 24 megapixel vs the older 16 megapixels, it does gives a bit more sharpness ability to crop in later.


  • Like other more modern sensors, the X-Trans 3 lost some of that magic color the older sensors had. It renders more realistic colors which is good for some things but not for others. I miss those X-Trans 2 colors. On the other hand I like the colors of X-Trans 3 (or newer) for night photography. Also liked the dark blue colors it produced (royal blue I think the color is called).
A good example of the very nice dark blue colors the X-Trans 3 can produce.
Shot on the Fujifilm X-H1: a good sensor for night photos.

X-Trans 4

The last X-Trans sensor (for now), found in Fujifilm X-T3, X-T4, X-T30, X-E4, X-Pro3, X100V, X-S10 etc. I tried to find a photo in my collection that shows the X-Trans 4 colors in a good way, but couldn’t, so no photos.


  • Auto focus now got even better than the DSLR counterparts it was competing against for years. Object tracking works great and fast moving subjects is no problem.
  • 26 megapixels, 2 megapixels more than past sensors, I can not tell the difference, but still an upgrade.


  • Even more flat and boring colors than the X-Trans 3 sensor.
  • Some tests imply it performs slightly worse than X-Trans 3 in high iso performance. Haven’t noticed it myself tough.
  • The sensor sometimes performs very poorly in Lightroom, shadow recovery and sharpness is poor. If you run into the problem try Capture One.
Shot with Fujifilm X-T3 + XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 R LM OIS. Yes it looks fine, but personally I really don’t like the yellow/orange colors from the X-Trans 4 sensor compared to the X-Trans 2.
Shot with Fujifilm X-T3 + XF 90mm f2. The X-Trans 4 has more “boring” colors but in good lighting conditions (like this), the sensor can still produce some very nice colors. And most important is the fast auto focus, that is often more important than colors if you are shooting moving subjects.


I really love X-Trans 2 for it’s colors for day time photography, I love the X-Trans 3 for night photography, and I love the snappy auto focus from X-Trans 4. For me the camera choices are Fujifilm X-E2 / X-T10, Fujifilm X-H1 and Fujifilm X-T3.

If you are curious about the old sensors, I recommend you to check out my raw file sample page where you can download raw files from most of these sensors.

Update 1: I only tried X-Trans 5 sensor cameras for a short time and they do seem to produce the same kind of colors as X-Trans 4. Also if you are wondering about Fujifilm GFX, I wrote a blog post about trying Fujifilm GFX 50S II and to me the colors are worse than any of the X-Trans aps-c sensors, and the colors reminds me more of the budget Bayer-sensor aps-c sensor cameras from Fujifilm.

Update 2: Prices have gone up quite a lot for X-Trans 1 + 2 sensor cameras, probably because people are realizing that there is something about those sensors.